[albatross-users] New version of the standalone http server

[Matt Goodall]

Dave Cole wrote:

>>What are your thoughts on this? I will split the al-httpd script up
>>today, as detailed above, if you think it's a good approach, or if
>>you want to keep it simple, I'm happy with that too.
>>    
>>
>
>I agree 100% that it should be split into an importable module and a
>program to launch applications.
>
>Andrew, do you have any excellent ideas about naming of the program
>and module?
>
>Off the top of my head I would like to rename the current
>session-server directory to tools and place the new al-httpd program
>in there.  I also think that the importable module should probably be
>called httpdapp and should live side by side with fcgiapp, apacheapp,
>and cgiapp.
>
>Matt, this is different to what you have said above, but I think more
>consistent with the current layout.
>
>- Dave
>
>  
>
Cool, I think this is the best solution overall - the simplicity of 
al-httpd with the flexibility of the module. If you're happy to make 
these changes then go ahead but just say if you want me to do anything 
to help.

- Matt

-- 
Matt Goodall, Pollenation Internet Ltd
e: matt at pollenationinternet.com