[albatross-users] Albatross Production Ready / Typical use?

[Michael C. Neel]

We use albatross *a lot* on some very large sites.  Some very simple
sites, where we just use the template language to act as a SSI on
steriods, some very complex sites where I can't even imagine how I would
solve it in perl and without albatross.

The docs have improved 10-fold thanks to suggestions on this list and
the hard work of the guys at object craft.  Also, there is now a wiki up
with lots of good tips.  I think that the lack of questions recently is
due to the new docs and wiki, that and albatross is pretty stable.

I think the install base is pretty small compared to other options, but
this is true of python as well.  Albatross also is not the normal
template package most expect either, and requires some shift in thinking
to really use at it's best.

I wish I could name the sites we have done in albatross, but I'd need
clearance from work and clients :/

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtjohan at syspres.com [mailto:rtjohan at syspres.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:22 PM
> To: albatross-users at object-craft.com.au
> Subject: [albatross-users] Albatross Production Ready / Typical use?
> 
> 
> Are there some large website that have been developed with Albatross?
> What type of sites (size/complexity/number of devlopers/intra 
> vs. internet)
> is Albatross specifically well suited for?
> 
> Is it being widely used? Seems like this list has been pretty 
> quite. Maybe
> everyone is using it happily, the documentation is so good 
> that nobody has
> questions, and the system is so reliable that no bugs are 
> reported. The
> alternative is that its not being used very much.
> 
> Thanks for any insight?
> Richard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Albatross-users mailing list
> Albatross-users at object-craft.com.au
> https://www.object-craft.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/albat
ross-users